Home

www.posturepros.com

My Account Login

Scoliosis

Introduction

The thoughts, ideas, and recommendations presented in this brochure should be

considered investigational and experimental ONLY. To date, only one study has been

published regarding this new biomechanical method of treating scoliosis, and clearly this

is not enough to prove its effectiveness. It is our goal to implement a larger, long-term

study to follow up on the promise offered by this initial research as quickly as possible.

I wrote this brochure because, over the years I have spent working in my father.s

chiropractic clinic, I have developed a great deal of respect and even admiration for the

men and women of all ages who have come to us for treatment of their scoliosis. I have

listened to their stories, empathized with their pain, and shared in their joy as positive

changes were made to their so-called .incurable. condition. I have also formed close,

personal relationships with men and women who, in their youth, had undergone the

Harrington rod implantation surgery in an attempt to halt the progression of their

scoliosis and, sadly, found the quality of their lives worsened, rather than improved, by

the procedure.

Scoliosis is estimated to affect 4.5% of the general population. In a nation of

approximately 273 million people, this means that over 12 million cases of scoliosis

exist, and almost 500 more are diagnosed each day . about 173,000 every year.

According to some studies, the average scoliosis patient will suffer a 14-year reduction in

their average life expectancy

scoliosis completely, this would add 168 million years of health and productivity to our

society. Clearly this is not a minor issue, but an epidemic, and one that should be taken

very seriously. Finding a proven and cost-effective method of treating scoliosis should

be the chiropractic profession.s top priority. Until we have done so, I do not believe that

any chiropractor in the world has the right to describe themselves as .spinal experts..

There are no scoliosis experts. If there were, there would be no scoliosis patients.

The information I offer in this brochure is intended to be the first step in a long journey

towards coordinating the care and correction of scoliosis patients throughout the world.

Please consider it carefully, evaluate the alternatives, and then make a conscious and

deliberate decision on its validity. For too long, professional jealousy and the status quo

have dominated all facets of the healthcare profession. It is time to refocus on the real

reason this profession exists . to serve our patients. Let us place the health and wellbeing

of those who have been entrusted to our care before any personal considerations,

and work together to find the most effective cure for every condition.

If this brochure has found its way into your hands, there must be a reason. Please

do not hesitate to copy and distribute the information herein to all who might benefit

from it, but under no condition should you sell it for a profit. As the author, I have made

a personal oath to share the information in this article without regard for financial

compensation, and I encourage you to do likewise.

I thank you sincerely for taking time to read this brochure, and pray that it inspires

and rekindles in you the passion for life, health, and happiness that has led each of us to

walk this path.

1. This means that if by some miracle we could eliminate

Scoliosis Surgery: the Untold Truth

Every year in the United States, roughly 20,000 Harrington rod implantation

surgeries are performed on patients with scoliosis, at an average cost of $120,000 per

operation

Every year, about 8,000 people who underwent this surgery in their youth for the

correction of their scoliosis are legally defined as permanently disabled for the rest of

their lives

an average of 22 years after the surgery was performed, their scoliosis has returned to

pre-operative levels

break loose from the wires, or worse, break completely in two, necessitating further

surgical intervention and removal of the rod. Once the rod is removed, corrosion (rust) is

found on two out of every three

After the operation is performed, the average patient suffers a 25% reduction in

their spinal ranges of motion

impairment. This flatly contradicts the claim that having a steel rod fused to your spine

will not affect your mobility, physical activities, or quality of life.

These facts are never shared with the patient prior to the surgery. Parents do not

choose the Harrington rod implantation procedure because it is the best choice for their

son or daughter, but rather because they are misled into believing that it is the

2. One-third of all spinal surgeries are performed on scoliosis patients.8. Even worse, follow-up x-rays performed upon these individuals reveal that,3. The Harrington rods inserted into their spines will either bend,4.5. Non-fused adult scoliosis patients do not have this sameonly

choice. However, many studies suggest that the side effects of the surgery are worse than

the side effects of the scoliosis itself. Consider the titles & conclusions of the following

studies:

Treating Scoliosis in Young Unneeded

Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Stuart Weinstein, MD, University

of Iowa, 2003.

.Many with curvature of spine go on to lead normal lives. Many adolescents

diagnosed with spine curvatures can skip braces, surgery or other treatment without

developing debilitating physical impairments, a 50 year study suggests..

Long-term results of quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis after

Harrington instrumentation and their relevance for expert evidence

Gotze C, Slomka A, Gotze HG, Potzl W, Liljenqvist U, Steinbeck J.

Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2002 Sep-Oct;140(5):492-8

.CONCLUSION: Forty percent of operated treated patients with idiopathic

scoliosis were legally defined as severely handicapped persons 16.7 years after the

surgery..

Medical Complications in scoliosis surgery

Curr Opin Pediatr 2001 Feb;13(1):36-41

.[Complications] include the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone,

pancreatitis, superior mesentaric artery syndrome, ileus, pnemothorax, hemothorax,

chylothorax and fat embolism. Urinary tract infections, wound infection and hardware

failure are not addressed.. [They were not addressed because happened so often!]

Results of Surgical Treatment of Adults with Idiopathic Scoliosis

J Bone Joint Surg AM 1987 Jun;69(5) :667-75 Sponseller, Nachemson et al,

.Frequency of pain was not reduced. pulmonary function did not change. 40%

had minor complications, 20% had major complications, and. there was 1 death [out of

45 patients]. In view of the high rate of complications, the limited gains to be derived

from spinal fusion should be assessed and clearly explained to the patient..

Corrosion of spinal implants retrieved from patients with scoliosis

Akazawa T, Minami S, Takahashi K, Kotani T, Hanawa T, Moriya H.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-

1 Inohana, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10(2):200-5.

.Corrosion was seen on many of the rod junctions (66.2%) after long-term

implantation..

Scoliosis curve correction, thoracic volume changes, and thoracic diameters in

scoliotic patients after anterior and posterior instrumentation

Int Orthop 2001;25(2):66-0

.The correlation between the change in Cobb angle and the thoracic volume

change was poor for both groups.. [e.g., whether fused in the front or back of the spine,

surgery will not improve cardiopulmonary function.]

Radiologic findings and curve progression 22 years after treatment for AIS

Spine 2001 Mar 1;26(5):516-25

.Initial average loss of spinal correction post-surgery is 3.2 degrees in the first

year and 6.5 after two years with continued loss of 1.0 degrees per year throughout life..

[So, if a 50 degree Cobb angle is corrected by surgery to 25 degrees, it will return to its

pre-operative condition of 50 degrees after roughly twenty years.]

Prospective Evaluation of Trunk Range of Motion in AIS Undergoing Spinal Fusion

Spine 2002 Jun 15;27 (12) :1346-54 Engsberg et al, Wash U, St. Louis, MO

.Whereas range of motion was reduced in the fused regions of the spine,

also reduced in un-fused regions

at un-fused regions contradicts current theory..

it was [emphasis added]. The lack of compensatory increase

Health-related quality of life in patients with AIS; a matched follow-up at least 20

years after treatment with brace (BT) or surgery (ST)

European Spine Journal 2001; Aug; 10(4): 278-88

.

their back..

49% of surgically-treated patients admitted limitation of social activities due to

Paul Harrington,

scoliotic spines, stated in 1963 that, "

is a condition involving much more than the spinal column

Out of the scientific journal Pediatric Rehabilitation comes perhaps the most

truthful and compelling study ever published on scoliosis surgery:

known for inventing the surgery that implants metal rods inmetal does not cure the disease of scoliosis, which ..

Impact of Spine Surgery on Signs and Symptoms of Spinal Deformity

Pediatr Rehabil. 2006 Oct-Dec;9(4):318-39

Hawes, M.

University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

.Pediatric scoliosis is associated with signs and symptoms including

reduced pulmonary function, increased pain and impaired quality of life, all of

which worsen during adulthood, even then the curvature remains stable. Spinal

fusion has been used as a treatment for nearly 100 years. In 1941, the American

Orthopedic Association reported that for 70% of patients treated surgically,

outcome was fair or poor: an average 65% curvature correction was reduced to

27% at greater than two year follow-up and the torso deformity was unchanged or

worse. Outcome was worse in children treated surgically before age 10, despite

earlier intervention. Today, a reduced magnitude of curvature obtained by spinal

fusion in adolescence can be maintained for decades. However, successful

surgery still does not eliminate spinal curvature and it introduces irreversible

complications whose long-term impact is poorly understood. For most patients

there is little or no improvement in pulmonary function. Some report improved

pain after surgery, some report no improvement, and some report increased pain.

The rib deformity is eliminated only by rib resection, which can dramatically

reduce respiratory function even in healthy adolescents. Outcome for pulmonary

function and deformity is worse for patients treated surgically before the age of 10

years, despite earlier intervention. Research to develop effective non-surgical

methods to prevent progression of mild, reversible spinal curvatures into complex,

irreversible deformities, is long overdue..

These x-rays show Harrington rods that bent and broke while still inside the

patient.s body. Many surgeons will refuse to operate on this condition, leaving the

patient with few options to alleviate their pain & suffering.

Good Questions & Honest Answers

Q: There.s a lot of controversy about whether or not bracing works. What is

your opinion about treating scoliosis with a brace?

A: The controversy over the effectiveness of bracing is somewhat misleading.

You will never find any doctor in the world claiming that bracing will reduce or correct

scoliosis; rather, the debate is over whether or not wearing a brace will prevent the

scoliosis from getting worse. When doctors state that bracing .works,. what they.re

really saying is that it stabilizes the scoliosis, keeping it at its current position. Most

doctors will insist that bracing does .work. . with proper compliance. Recommended

compliance is twenty-three hours per day, every day. If this seems a little extreme to

you, you.re not alone.

In a study published in the American Journal of Orthopedics, 60% of the patients

surveyed felt that bracing had handicapped their life, and 14% felt it had left a

psychological scar

recommended bracing as a treatment for scoliosis since 1991, stating, .If bracing does

not reduce the proportion of children with AIS [adolescent idiopathic scoliosis] who

require surgery for cosmetic improvement of their deformity, it cannot be said to provide

a meaningful advantage to the patient or the community..

6. The Children.s Research Center in Dublin, Ireland, has not7

Q: If it is so harmful, then why is the Harrington rod implantation surgery

still being performed in the United States?

A: First, many healthcare professionals are not aware of the scientific literature

that details the negative side effects of the procedure. Also, very little follow-up with the

patient is performed after the operation. Many surgeons believe that the surgeries they

perform are beneficial to the patient because no one has returned to their office after the

operation to inform them otherwise. Doctors are desperate to meet their patients.

demands for treatment of their scoliosis, but have no options besides prescribing bracing

(which, at best, only slows or stops progression, and at worst, actually worsens the

scoliosis by weakening the postural muscles), or performing the surgery.

Obviously, if surgeons stop performing this surgery, they stand to lose a great

deal of money. Alternative treatment methods for scoliosis are simply not explored by

the established medical community because of the possibility that they may prove to be

more effective and less costly, thereby eliminating both the need to treat scoliosis

surgically, and also their source of income.

Q: Why will my insurance company pay for the Harrington rod surgery, but

not alternative methods of scoliosis treatment such as chiropractic?

A: The answer is deceptively simple, and unfortunately based upon the laws of

economics, rather than what is best for the patient. The insurance companies are

undoubtedly aware of the research stating that 40% of operated patients are legally

defined as permanently handicapped for the rest of their lives

insurance company.s financial responsibility for that patient is terminated, and federal

Social Security & Disability programs are responsible for covering all medical expenses.

8; in such an event, the

Q: Why should I seek treatment for my scoliosis from a chiropractor

certified by CLEAR Institute? What do they know that my regular D.C. doesn.t?

A: Typical chiropractic adjustments have been proven to be ineffective or even

harmful to the scoliotic patient, due to the mobilization of fixated vertebrae by the

adjustment. While this may cause pain relief in the short term, the long term result is

increased progression of the Cobb angle. CLEAR practitioners are not focused on

relieving pain, although this is certainly the end result. Chiropractors trained by CLEAR

Institute are committed to achieving structural changes to the spine that will allow the

body to de-rotate and correct itself, and use specific, reproducible precision x-rays that

are analyzed according to exact guidelines to measure and quantify the change.

Q: My scoliosis is termed .idiopathic,. meaning the cause is unknown. Is it

true that I inherited this condition from my mother?

A: You may have heard that researchers at the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for

Children recently discovered a gene associated with scoliosis. However, there are several

flaws with the .gene theory. of disease. For instance, it has been universally recognized

in recent years that attempting to attribute a genetic basis to any disease is an exercise in

futility. While there may be such a thing as a genetic

genetic marker for a specific disease is in no way a guarantee that the carrier will ever

express that particular gene. An article featured in the July 2005 issue of

American

appropriate confirmation of this concept. Even amongst identical twins, gene expression

differs over one-third of the time!

CLEAR Institute teaches that scoliosis is the body.s natural and innate response to

the loss of mechanical function provided by the normal curves of the spine. When these

curves disappear, the body re-inserts them in another dimension. If scoliosis has a

.cause,. then it can only be described as the laws of physics!

It is easy to understand this concept of mechanical advantage for yourself. Find a

heavy weight, about 10 to 20 pounds, and hold it in your hand for a while. If you have to

support this weight for a long time, there is a natural position that the body will assume:

your elbow will come close to your body, and your palm will be up, with your fingers

facing towards you. This is very similar to how your spine supports the weight of your

head with the curve in your neck. When you bend your hand forward & remove that

curve from your wrist, your elbow will swing out to the side to replace the lost stability.

This is very similar to what happens in your spine when the curve in your neck is lost; the

body develops scoliosis because a straight spine is extremely unstable. Essentially,

scoliosis is a biomechanical reaction to forward head posture & the loss of the curve in

the neck, and develops due to pressure & interference on the nerves responsible for

maintaining posture & symmetry during growth, which are concentrated in the neck.

In conclusion, perhaps some people are more likely to develop scoliosis than

others, but there is a still a reason why one person will and another will not. With

scoliosis, just like with everything else, your environment determines which genes will

become expressed and which will remain dormant. With the stability provided by the

natural curves of the spine, there is no need for the body to develop & maintain a

scoliosis.

predisposition, the presence of aScientific, entitled, "Identical Twins Exhibit Differences in Gene Expression," is an

New Research, New Possibilities

On September 14

Disorders entitled, .

rehabilitative therapy

Lawrence, D.C. In this study, twenty-two scoliosis cases with Cobb angles ranging from

15 to 52 degrees were treated with an experimental rehabilitation protocol involving

specific spinal adjustments, exercise therapy, and vibratory stimulation. Three subjects

were dismissed from the study for non-compliance. After 4-6 weeks of treatment, the

nineteen scoliosis patients who remained had experienced an average reduction in their

Cobb angle of 62%. Individually, reduction varied from 8 to 33 degrees. None of the

patients. Cobb angles increased. The conclusion of the study was that these results

warrant further testing of this new protocol. To see the study for yourself, go online at:

th, 2004, an article was published in BMC MusculoskeletalScoliosis treatment using a combination of manipulative and,. by Mark Morningstar, D.C., Dennis Woggon, D.C., and Gary

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/5/32

Since this study, we have attempted to understand exactly why such positive

results were achieved, and our research has led us to the following theories:

1.) Scoliosis is caused by a dysponesis (miscommunication) between the motorsensory

input/output from the upper trunk to the lower. This is in turn caused by a

unilateral (one-sided) impairment of the spino-cerebellar loop, which is located in the

area between the occiput and the first cervical vertebra. Supporting this theory is the fact

that 100% of scoliosis patients have a problem with proprioception (orientation of the

body in time and space), and 100% of scoliosis patients have a loss of the curve in their

neck, resulting in forward head posture.

2.) Exercise rehabilitation therapy is mandatory to reverse the scoliosis. Without

patient compliance, no amount of care can help. It is necessary to retrain the postural

muscles of the body. Vibratory stimulation overrides the body.s proprioceptive signals

and mechanoreceptors, thus facilitating retraining of the postural muscles.

3.) Cobb angles over 30 degrees cannot be reduced in the same manner as Cobb

angles under 30 degrees. The muscles contract more on the convexity of the curve, rather

than the concavity, as is the case with angles under 30 degrees. Normal laws of

biomechanics do not apply in patients with Cobb angles of more than 30 degrees!

These theories have led to the composition of a treatment protocol for scoliosis

patients that, so far, has had universal success in compliant patients. While surgery may

be necessary in some cases, such as when the patient exhibits non-compliance with

mandatory exercise rehabilitation protocols, this information should be encouraging to

parents of children with scoliosis who are debating whether or not to schedule the

Harrington rod implantation surgery for their son or daughter. I would like to personally

encourage you to delay the surgery until all other non-surgical options have been

exhausted. Long-term ramifications of the Harrington surgery have been so unfavorable

that the new recommendations are to remove the rods after four years

is known about how the build-up of scar tissue and the disruption of the spinal pathology

will affect the patient in the future once the rods have been removed.

4. Little to nothing

Recommendations for Scoliosis Treatment

One component is universally lacking in nearly all

forms of scoliosis treatment today: the effect of the cervical

spine in determining spinal pathology, gait, stance, and overall

posture. The head controls all components of the spine below

it, much like how the engine controls the direction of a train.

Without regard for which direction the locomotive is heading

in, how is it possible to control the boxcars behind it? The very

first aspect that must be addressed in scoliosis correction is the

cervical spine; specifically, correcting the forward head posture

by restoring the curve and the normal ranges of motion in the

neck, especially between the occiput (C0) and the atlas (C1).

This is why lateral cervical views in neutral, flexion, and

extension are necessary. Follow-up x-rays should be performed roughly every three

months as objective proof of improvement; should the patient.s progress plateau or

regress, additional rehabilitation or alterations to the protocol may be required.

Obviously thoracic views are necessary to measure the Cobb angle, but stay away from

full-spine views! The rate of distortion is too high to allow for consistency and accuracy

when comparing measurements between pre- and post- x-rays. It is also important to

evaluate the curve in the low back, and rotation in the hips with lateral and A-P lumbar xrays,

and correct any deviation from normal that is found.

Balance and proprioception also play an important

role in the rehabilitation of the scoliotic patient. One method

of reducing forward head posture and retraining postural

muscles is deceptively simple: by blocking the superior half

of the lens on a pair of glasses, and instructing the patient to wear them for at least twenty

minutes, the postural muscles of the neck are retrained to better hold the cervical lordosis

in place. Various spinal weights may be placed on the head and/or hips to activate the

weakened postural muscles. Also, whole-body vibration therapy (WBV) has been

scientifically proven to be extremely effective at proprioceptive re-education.

Do NOT make the mistake of trying to push. a scoliosis

out of the spine! This type of adjustment is foreign to the body,

and will be resisted. Most scoliosis braces are ineffective or even

harmful because they do exactly this. A scoliotic spine must be

visualized and corrected three-dimensionally; the lateral curve will

not reduce until the spine has been de-compressed and de-rotated.

Adjusting the apex of the curve, whether into the concavity or the

convexity, will inevitably make the situation worse

pulling . is far more effective because it is a subtler, gentler force,

and one that is less readily resisted by the body. CLEAR Institute

has developed a chair that incorporates cervical decompression

with lateral thoracic and lumbar traction, and also addresses the

rotational aspect of the scoliosis simultaneously. This passive

exercise therapy can be performed by the patient at the clinic or at

home.

The Results

(see more at www.clear-institute.com):

Leah Leah

June 19, 2002 December 9, 2004

Working with scoliosis cases can be very frustrating, challenging, and rewarding

. sometimes all at once! Not every chiropractor may have the time or dedication to

commit to long-term endeavors such as is required with scoliosis. To those who do, I

offer my eternal appreciation, gratitude, and support. What you do is more than lifesaving

. it.s life-

at

There are also seminars currently being arranged through the efforts of dedicated

and experienced chiropractors affiliated with CLEAR Institute and fully trained in the

scoliosis correction technique and use of the adjunct equipment. Please contact the D.C.

nearest you to learn more about satellite seminars & workshops, or go online to

changing. www.clear-institute.com.

The typical cost for a year.s worth of scoliosis care varies depending upon the region, but averages around $8,000. Insurance companies may reimburse some or all of

the costs of treatment. Cobb angles under 30 degrees can be corrected through

chiropractic adjustments & spinal exercises; Cobb angles larger than 30 degrees will also

require the patient to invest in home rehabilitation equipment, such as a Scoliosis

Traction Chair, for use at home during treatment, and, sadly, insurance companies rarely

reimburse these expenses. Once the scoliosis is corrected, changes are permanent as long

as the patient maintains good spinal health, meaning daily spinal exercises and

chiropractic check-ups every month or two.

I wish there was a quick & easy fix, but in reality there is no such thing. Surgery

& bracing will leave scars . physically or psychologically . and may result in permanent

damage to mental or physical health even worse than the side effects of the scoliosis.

Our technique requires hard work and dedication, both on the part of the chiropractor and

the patient, to achieve real, lasting results.

Contrary to medical misinformation, scoliosis correction is technique has achieved results in patients from ages 8 to 84.not age-dependent and it does not stop at osseous maturity. Our

About CLEAR Institute

(Chiropractic Leadership, Educational Advancement, & Research)

CLEAR Institute was an idea conceived in 1998 by Dr. Dennis Woggon, who has

run a successful chiropractic practice since 1974. Founded in 2000, the original intent of

CLEAR was to provide advanced professional training to chiropractors and chiropractic

students on all aspects of practice; diagnostics, treatment protocols, and management. As

the organization evolved to meet the needs of its clients, our focus began to narrow as our

vision expanded. Today, we address the most challenging aspects of treatment that

chiropractors are likely to encounter in their day-to-day practice; cases such as whiplash

associated disorders and soft tissue injuries, as well as the most challenging spinal

condition of all: scoliosis.

Our specialty, however, is not limited merely to the treatment of scoliosis.

CLEAR Institute works closely with a variety of other companies

chiropractors with assistance in patient education, case management, insurance billing &

coding, x-ray analysis, spinal rehabilitation exercises, and functional testing. Our goal is

to guide chiropractors every step of the journey as they become true .spinal experts,.

able to quickly and accurately diagnosis, treat, and understand the intricacies of the spinal

engine.

Through seminars and lectures presented at chiropractic colleges, conferences,

and symposiums, our first mission is to spread the chiropractic message; drugs & surgery

will only address the symptoms of disease, never the cause. From there, we present

alternatives to the medically-recommended treatments that are safe, effective, and

clinically proven. Research is an integral part of CLEAR Institute; if we cannot

objectively prove that a particular method of treatment is effective, we do not advocate it.

Once the information has been presented, we then look for chiropractors who have the

dedication and commitment to become spinal experts, and work with them to provide

them with the tools and knowledge they will need to make permanent structural and

functional corrections in their most difficult patients. To facilitate this goal, we provide a

list of recommended equipment that CLEAR Institute endorses as safe and effective,

including vibration therapy equipment invented by Dr. Woggon. To view a list of these

products and obtain ordering information, please contact CLEAR Institute.

CLEAR Institute has recently begun to enlist the support of chiropractors across

the nation who are recognized as leaders in spinal biomechanics and can help introduce

others to our organization. An important prerequisite prior to joining CLEAR Institute is

that the chiropractor must have an active practice; while research may prove what is

effective, only clinical experience can prove its practicality. If you are interested in

viewing or joining our membership list, please visit our website for more information.

Thank you sincerely for your interest in CLEAR Institute; with your help, we

hope to spread a message of hope and healing across the world; chiropractic CAN help

scoliosis, and CLEAR Institute will lead the way!

Interested in learning more?

Sign up online at our website,

monthly newsletter!

Research & References

1.)

Idiopathic Scoliosis: long-term follow-up & prognosis in untreated patients

J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981 Jun;63(5):702-12

2.)

The estimated cost of school scoliosis screening

Spine 2000 Sep 15;25(18):2387-91 Yawn & Yawn

3.)

Radiologic findings and curve progression 22 years after treatment for AIS

Spine 2001 Mar 1;26(5):516-25

4.)

Corrosion of spinal implants retrieved from patients with scoliosis

J Orthop Sci 2005;10(2):200-5

5.)

Comparison of Fused & Nonfused Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis

The Effect of Scoliosis Fusion Surgery on Spinal Ranges of Motion: a

Spine 2006;31(3):309-314

6.)

The etiology of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Am J Orthop 2002 Jul;31(7):387-95

7.)

incidence of surgery

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: the effect of brace treatment on the

Spine 2001 Jan 1;26(1):42-7

8.)

Harrington instrumentation and their relevance for expert evidence

Long-term results of quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis after

Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2002 Sep-Oct;140(5):492-8

9.)

The Search for Idiopathic Scoliosis Genes

Spine 2006;31(6):679-81

10.)

The Ste-Justine Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Cohort Study

Spine 1994 Jul 15;19(14):1573-81

11.)

mortality, causes of death, and symptoms

Long-term follow-up of patients with untreated scoliosis: a study of

Spine 1992 Sep 17;(9):1091-6

12.)

for scoliosis

Back pain and disability after Harrington rod fusion to the lumbar spine

Spine 1992 Aug 17;(8 Suppl):S249-53

13.)

Results of surgical treatment of adults with idiopathic scoliosis

J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987 Jun;69(5):667-75

14.)

Thoracic Scoliosis and restricted neck motion: a new syndrome?

Eur Spine J 1998;7:155-57

Top

Newsletter Sign Up










3D Spine Simulator


Launch 3D Spine Simulator

Member Login

Send Password | Sign Up